This is the "Intro" page of the "Evaluating Websites" guide.
Alternate Page for Screenreader Users
Skip to Page Navigation
Skip to Page Content
Library Homepage College Homepage

Evaluating Websites  

Guidance on evaluating whether a particular website is a good-quality source.
Last Updated: Jul 1, 2014 URL: http://geiselguides.anselm.edu/evaluatewebsites Print Guide RSS Updates
Intro Print Page
  Search: 
 
 

Introduction

While the world of the web has its place in the world of academia, one must use caution before accepting freely posted (unpublished) information as reliable or appropriate to scholarship.

Determining reliability requires practice and critical thinking. This guide lists some questions that you should ask yourself before accepting or rejecting a website for its scholarly value.

If in doubt about the merits of a website for research purposes, please discuss it with your instructor or a librarian.

 

Handout Version

For a one-page handout of this guide's content, download this:

Evaluating Websites handout

 

Criteria

Authority

  • Can the authoring body of the page be determined?
  • Is there contact information such as address, phone number or e-mail address?
  • Is the domain .com? Or is it .gov, .edu, maybe .org?
  • Does the author have expertise, such as an advanced degree or an affiliation with a reputable organization?
  • Do other reputable organizations link to the site? Perform a 'link' search in Google.
    (e.g., go to http://www.google.com and type in "link:http://www.bedfordstmartins.com/online/citex.html")

Accuracy

  • Is there supporting documentation such as a bibliography or footnotes to indicate the sources of the information?
  • Are there misspellings or grammatical errors?
  • Can anyone post to the website? (e.g. Wikipedia)

Objectivity

  • Does the authoring body have a bias or agenda such as with an advocacy or lobby group? If so, is this bias stated or hidden?
  • Is inflammatory, emotional or political language being used?
  • If the subject matter is controversial, are all views represented?

Currency

  • How current is the information? Are there references to recent developments?
  • Are dates included (e.g. "First Posted" date, "Last Updated" date)?
  • How many dead links are on the page?

Content

  • Does the content supply more images or advertising than text?
  • How detailed is the information supplied? If an overview, perhaps a library reference or e-reference book would be more helpful.
  • If a journal article, is it peer-reviewed (that is, has it been evaluated and approved by scholarly peers prior to publication)?
  • Has the site been rated for its content by a reputable rating group?
  • Can the content be viewed without requiring special technology or fees?
 

Ask a Librarian

If you need help with your research or with any of the resources on this guide, contact us via:

Email
Chat Chat
Call   (603) 641-7306
Text  (603) 556-8883

    **Chat and text available in afternoons and evenings.

      Description

      Loading  Loading...

      Tip